|
|
Monday, May 14
|
Christopher Hitchens vs. Al Sharpton in mp3 format is downloadable from HERE without to much hassle. Thanks to KKant at richarddawkins.net for converting the audio and posting it.
Posted - 5/14/2007 07:52:00 PM - Permalink | |
|
|
|
|
Wednesday, May 9
|
Joel Mowbray takes a look at the visa applications of the 9/11 terrorists. They should have been denied on thier face.
Posted - 5/09/2007 06:33:00 PM - Permalink | |
|
|
|
|
Friday, May 4
|
"Michael Moore finds himself on the business end of a documentary," and Louis Wittig writes about it at The Weekly Standard.
Posted - 5/04/2007 08:26:00 PM - Permalink | |
|
|
|
|
Saturday, April 21
|
The Jerusalem Post reports three people were killed in an attack on a Bible publishing house in Turkey: Assailants killed three people Wednesday at a publishing house that distributed Bibles, in the latest attack apparently targeting Turkey's tiny Christian minority.
The three victims were found with their throats slit and their hands and legs bound at the Zirve publishing house in Malatya, a city in eastern central Turkey, local Gov. Ibrahim Dasoz said. One was found still alive and was taken to the hospital, but later died, he said.
Two of the victims were Turkish, and one was a German who had lived in Malatya since 2003, Dasoz said. The German ambassador to Turkey said he was shocked by the attack. The perps were not to swift - one jumped from a high window to escape and wopund up wityh severe head trama. The final two graphs: The manner in which the victims were bound suggested the attack could have been the work of a local Islamic group, commentators said, and CNN-Turk television reported that police were investigating the possible involvement of Turkish Hizbullah - a Kurdish Islamic organization that aims to form a Muslim state in Turkey's Kurdish-dominated southeast.
Turkish Hizbullah - which has been known to "hog-tie" its victims while torturing them - takes its name from the better-known Lebanon-based Hizbullah, but has no formal links to it.
Posted - 4/21/2007 05:21:00 PM - Permalink | |
|
|
|
|
Friday, November 3
|
DRUDGE HEADLINE: 12 SMARTCARDS THAT CONTROL ELECTRONIC VOTING MACHINES GO MISSING IN TENNESSEE Not surprising is the fact that the voting precinct where this happened, Bishop Byrne H.S. on East Shelby Drive, is a South Memphis Democrat Stronhold. From Drudge: Political insiders have expressed alarm after 12 voter smartcards have gone missing from one Shelby County, TN early vote location!
The cards are used to activate electronic voting machines.
The location at the center of the controversy is Bishop Byrne High School on E. Shelby Drive in Memphis.
The polling place started out with 25 cards. By Wednesday, 11 were missing, says an eyewitness.
The location was given 5 more smartcards on Thursday.
And another card went missing!
Someone possessing a smartcard could use 'off the shelf equipment' [equipment that reprograms the card] and alter it to be used multiple times, and cast multiple votes.
One concerned insider explains: "Shelby County Board of Elections has been notified. They said is was 'not a big deal' because, they said, the cards are deactivated. But the reality is, you can buy the equipment at computer stores to reactivate them. It's on the Internet how to reactivate the cards!"
Meanwhile, The Tennessee Bureau of Investigation is reviewing reports by the Shelby County Election Commission that two people voted twice during early voting in Memphis.
Dist. Atty. Gen. Bill Gibbons said he's referred the cases to the TBI for investigation along with other matters he declined to discuss.
Poll watchers are expected to turn out Tuesday to observe voting in Tennessee's heated U.S. Senate race between Chattanooga Republican Bob Corker and Memphis Democrat Harold Ford Jr.
Developing...
Posted - 11/03/2006 04:15:00 PM - Permalink | |
|
From today's Washington Times, Liberal bloggers rip party over Lamont: National Democrats have abandoned their anti-war Senate candidate in Connecticut, say liberal bloggers who earlier this year were heavily courted by top Democrats in their quest to take over Congress.
Democratic nominee Ned Lamont -- darling of the left-wing blogosphere -- now trails Sen. Joe Lieberman by 10 points or more, and the highly energized bloggers who helped win him the nomination in August blame the national party. ...
... Liberal vitriol in recent weeks has been directed at some of the Democratic Party's most beloved figures, such as former President Bill Clinton, Senate Minority Leader Harry Reid of Nevada, Sen. Charles E. Schumer of New York and even rising star Sen. Barack Obama of Illinois.
"We have all been angry for some years now about being stabbed in the back by the Democratic Party in Washington," liberal blogger Sandra Yolles wrote in the comment field to Mr. Stoller's post. "We are angry that they have not fought for our values, for our ideals, for our Constitution, for honest elections, for the people who elected them."
The liberal blogosphere is filled with accusations that national Democrats helped Mr. Lamont only half-heartedly, failed to infuse his campaign with cash and couldn't resist effusively praising Mr. Lieberman even after he lost the Democratic nomination. Mr. Obama has been the focus of particular scorn for not campaigning in Connecticut against Mr. Lieberman. Read the whole thing.
Posted - 11/03/2006 09:59:00 AM - Permalink | |
|
|
|
|
Thursday, November 2
|
El Rushbo from last Tuesday: I will predict to you that the Drive-By Media is practicing and putting together their damage control on this, what they will do, if I'm right, we will soon see reports on whether Kerry has a point. They will go out and they'll explain what he actually "meant," what he was "trying to say." He went on last Tuesday to expand slightly on the point, and then today he said this: RUSH: Back on Tuesday when first discussing the John Kerry situation, I warned you people what I expected to occur in the Drive-By Media. One of the things I told you is that they will do segments on what Kerry really meant. I then said before this is all over, the odds are that one of them will actually go out and do a story about how Kerry was right, and they'll go out and try to find military families that fit the bill of Kerry's view of them and so forth and so on. Rush's prediction was right on the money: the MSM is saying there is Truth in Kerry's remark. The MSM has been heavily in the tank for the Dems and Kerry - with Suzanne Malveaux slipping up by stating her real feelings - she actually "hopes" the Kerry story is gone quick - and the NY Times flatly misrepresenting the content of Kerry's remarks. Also leading the charge is MSNBC's Chris Matthews. On Wednesday's Hardball, Matthews had Mark McKinnon and Bob Shrum on: MATTHEWS: Do you think he should have apologized for something he didn't say? You would like him to apologize for trashing the servicemen, and he says he didn't do that.
MCKINNON: No, he apologized if the servicemen took it that way, which many of them did.
MATTHEWS: Of course they took it that way if there's 48 hours of bashing by the Republicans. They only heard the attack. They didn't hear the initial comment.
MCKINNON: The interesting story that may be more relevant...
MATTHEWS: Let me get this straight now. When your opponent takes a word you said out of context and dump all over you on it, turning it into an attack on the military, then you apologize to the military for the fact they did it to you, right? Is that how it works, now?
.........
MATTHEWS: Bob, what I was impressed by was the Republican choreography of the last 24 hours. They had John Boehner out there saying he wasn't going to quit until this guy apologized. Well, he's done that. You had Denny Hastert, who was basically in the bunker himself out there in Illinois, he's out of the bunker attacking John Kerry.
They were joined by allies, and I was wrong the other day to say that it was coordinated. I thought it was. Apparently it wasn't. The head of the American Legion now says that he wasn't part of any coordination plan, although his press release arrived in the same pile, it all came out at the same time the other day.
I accept his word it wasn't part of a coordinated plan. But all of these people acted without checking out what Kerry said. Kerry did not attack the regular working person or the person who enlists in the military. He attacked the president's intelligence, which I think is a mistake, because you are always wrong when you attack the other guy's IQ.
But clearly that's what he was doing. But Kerry is stuck now, he has spent the day writhing over this thing, and ends up putting out an apology. The front pages tomorrow morning, which didn't have one him on today, will be on the front page tomorrow, I'll bet you, the "Washington Post" tomorrow, the "Boston Globe" will say, Kerry, quote, "apologizes" on the front page tomorrow. He's done it to the Democrats again.
SHRUM: Well I think he did it, in my view, because, a, what was being said about what he had said was a lie. B, he wanted to make sure that service people, and I don't know this, I'm just guessing at this, he wanted to make sure that service members understood that he wasn't talking about him.
MATTHEWS: Why did he apologize to him? Just tell me Bob, why he apologized to somebody he did not insult?
SHRUM: Because as you just said, Chris, they spent 48 hours telling a big lie about his remarks, distorting his remarks. Denny Hastert climbed out of his hole of corruption and grabbed onto this because he can't talk about anything else. George Bush can't talk about anything else. He doesn't want this war decided on the basis of Iraq. Every voter in America that votes next week will decide if we'll stay on the same failed course in Iraq, that's the fundamental issue in this election.
Strangely, Matthews was correct about the front page of the WaPo, where a slanted story appeared that made Kerry look like a poor victim of the evil-right-wing-smear-machine. Also check out Thomas Sowells new column, Senator Kerry, Media Darling - The media have circled the wagons around the junior senator from Massachusetts.
Posted - 11/02/2006 06:15:00 PM - Permalink | |
|
Kathryn Jean Lopez writes at NRO: "I'm pro-life, I'm pro-life, Tucker, so I mean, I don’t run from that."
So Congressman Harold Ford Jr. told MSNBC's Tucker Carlson on Monday.
It’s often been taken as a given that the attractive, smart, affable Ford is pro-life. On Fox News Sunday this past weekend Chris Wallace stated flatly in addressing Ford, “You are pro-life.”
But is Congressman Ford pro-life? His record suggests otherwise.
According to the National Right to Life Committee, Ford's claim to be pro-life "is radically at odds with Ford's 10-year voting record in the U.S. House. Overall, Ford has voted against the pro-life side 87 percent of the time." Kay-Lo also relays a TN GOP release: LAST NIGHT, ON HANNITY & COLMES, CONGRESSMAN FORD SAID HE WAS NEVER "PRO-CHOICE." YET, DURING HIS FIRST RUN FOR OFFICE, CONGRESSMAN FORD CALLED HIMSELF "PRO-CHOICE."
Congressman Ford Saying He Never Called Himself "Pro-Choice":
Congressman Ford: "No, No. I Was Not Pro-Choice At One Time." (Fox News' "Hannity & Colmes,”" 11/1/06)
Congressman Ford Saying He Is "Pro-Choice":
Congressman Ford: "[A]s It Relates To Abortion, I'm Pro-Choice. I'm Not Pro-Abortion. A Woman Has A Right To Choose Not To Have An Abortion As Much As She Has The Right To Choose To Have One." (Harold Ford, Jr. As Quoted In The Ninth U.S. House District Debate, The Commercial Appeal, October 29, 1996)
And this is from a TN GOP email: IN CASE YOU MISSED IT… U.S. Senate Race 2006
53%-43%: Independent Reuters/Zogby Poll Released Today Shows Corker With 10 Point Lead Heading Into Final Day Of Early Voting Second Poll This Week To Show Corker With More Than 50% Of Vote
(Nashville) - The second independent poll released this week shows U. S. Senate candidate Bob Corker leading in the Senate race with over 50% of the vote. The new independent Reuters/ Zogby poll shows Corker leading with 53% of the vote and Ford trailing with only 43%.
The Reuters/Zogby poll was taken October 24 through October 30 and has a 4 point margin of error. In early October, the same poll showed that the race was tied.
Earlier in the week an independent CNN poll showed U. S. Senate candidate Bob Corker leading Washington Congressman Harold Ford by 8 points, with Corker at 52% and Ford at 44%.
"On the final day of Early Voting, we are very pleased that the second public poll released this week shows us leading in this race with more than 50% of the vote," said Todd Womack, Corker for Senate Communications Director. "While the trends are encouraging, there is still much work to do and our great volunteers and supporters across the state are focused on the final push to get voters to the polls and ensure that Bob Corker is elected as Tennessee's next United States Senator."
Posted - 11/02/2006 06:03:00 PM - Permalink | |
|
In the wake of the John Kerry controversy, there is still a long held assumption among moonbat types that the military is made up largely of disadvantaged drop outs. Tim Kane's Heritage study that completely derails this notion is here, it's entitled Who Bears the Burden? Demographic Characteristics of U.S. Military Recruits Before and After 9/11. An event featuring Kane on the same subject, Bearing the Burden: Military Volunteers and the Case Against the Draft, is also interesting. An MP3 podcast of the event is here (right click, then "Save As.."). A Summary of the event: Contrary to claims that the U.S. military recruits are disproportionately poor, black, and urban in origin  justifying a reinstatement of the draft  a comprehensive new study of all U.S. military enlistees in 1999 and 2003 reveals exactly the opposite. Indeed, the proportion of recruits from rich neighborhoods exceeds that from poor neighborhoods.
Dr. Tim Kane of The Heritage FoundationÂs Center for Data Analysis forcefully dispels the myth of the underprivileged soldier, and provides surprising evidence of how demographics of the all-volunteer military actually changed after 9/11.
Join us as our panelists examine the characteristics of recruits including education, race, income, and region, to clarify just who among us is bearing the burden in the defense of our nation.
Posted - 11/02/2006 06:29:00 AM - Permalink | |
|
|
|
|
Monday, October 30
|
NY TimesIn Key House Races, Democrats Run to the Right, i.e. Dems try to win by being conservative.
Posted - 10/30/2006 04:23:00 PM - Permalink | |
|
|
|
Back
to top

Technorati Profile

Visitors
Feedster Claim
Joefish's Freshwater
Blog version 3.1
This site, and all artwork contained herein
(except link banners) created and owned by : Joefish
Best if viewed at a screen resolution of
800x600 or above with Internet Explorer
Applications used to create this site include:
Macromedia's;s Dreamweaver©, PaintShopPro7©,
Xara© Products, WS_FTPle©,
Microsoft's Frontpage, and Notepad.
|